Keyword: Point-of-Care Testing
1 result found.
Original Article
Central Asian Journal of Nephrology, 2(2), 2026, cajn015, https://doi.org/10.63946/cajn/18482
ABSTRACT:
Background: Rapid identification of patients at risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is essential in acute settings such as acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Point-of-care (POC) creatinine testing provides immediate assessment of kidney function; however, its reliability for clinical risk stratification relative to standard laboratory measurements remains uncertain. This study evaluated the agreement between laboratory- and POC creatinine-based risk stratification and their association with subsequent AKI after contrast angiography.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, 295 adults undergoing contrast-enhanced angiography for acute myocardial infarction or acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Serum creatinine was measured using both standard laboratory methods and a POC device before contrast administration. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation, and predicted risk of post-contrast AKI was assessed using the Mehran risk score. AKI was defined according to KDIGO criteria (≥1.5-fold increase from baseline or ≥26.5 µmol/L increase within 7 days). Agreement between laboratory- and POC-derived risk categories was evaluated using weighted Cohen’s kappa.
Results: The median age was 64 years (interquartile range 57–70), and 66.8% of participants were male. Based on laboratory measurements obtained in the hospital central laboratory, categories were low in 8.8%, moderate in 37.3%, high in 25.4%, and very high in 28.5% of patients. Among patients with available follow-up creatinine measurements (n = 127), CA-AKI occurred in 11.0% (14/127). Agreement between laboratory- and POC-based risk classifications was near-perfect (κ = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.98). The correlation between laboratory and POC creatinine values was moderate (r = 0.63, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: POC creatinine–based Mehran risk stratification shows excellent diagnostic agreement with laboratory-based assessment for identifying patients at risk of post-contrast AKI. POC testing may facilitate rapid bedside risk assessment in patients undergoing angiography for acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke without compromising risk classification reliability.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, 295 adults undergoing contrast-enhanced angiography for acute myocardial infarction or acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Serum creatinine was measured using both standard laboratory methods and a POC device before contrast administration. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation, and predicted risk of post-contrast AKI was assessed using the Mehran risk score. AKI was defined according to KDIGO criteria (≥1.5-fold increase from baseline or ≥26.5 µmol/L increase within 7 days). Agreement between laboratory- and POC-derived risk categories was evaluated using weighted Cohen’s kappa.
Results: The median age was 64 years (interquartile range 57–70), and 66.8% of participants were male. Based on laboratory measurements obtained in the hospital central laboratory, categories were low in 8.8%, moderate in 37.3%, high in 25.4%, and very high in 28.5% of patients. Among patients with available follow-up creatinine measurements (n = 127), CA-AKI occurred in 11.0% (14/127). Agreement between laboratory- and POC-based risk classifications was near-perfect (κ = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.98). The correlation between laboratory and POC creatinine values was moderate (r = 0.63, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: POC creatinine–based Mehran risk stratification shows excellent diagnostic agreement with laboratory-based assessment for identifying patients at risk of post-contrast AKI. POC testing may facilitate rapid bedside risk assessment in patients undergoing angiography for acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke without compromising risk classification reliability.
